Who would win in a fight? The wands or the biters?

Views: 4

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

wands! harry potter owns! lol :D
hmmm..... i'm a huge fan of both but if i had to choose it would be harry potter. now don't get me wrong, i love twilight and i have read all the books but, it's not much of a fight. one wrist flip with a wand and your dead.
Def Twilight. Edward Cullen over Harry Potter all the way. ;)
their both amazing but harry potter is a whollllle lot more fun to watch then twilight
It doesn't matter because Buffy would stake Edward before Harry could say "Avada Kedavra", because she's just that damn hardcore.

Seriously, though? Harry Potter wins, if only for the fact that VAMPIRES DON'T SPARKLE.
Both good... But bring on the vampireees :[ :)
I read Twilight long before most people read it, long before the movie and it was good, so were the rest of the books and the films are....moderately okay-ish, but nothing compares to Harry Potter, my god what an amazing series of books they were. They've made me cry over the years more than anything else in my life, you could say I'm sad but to be honest I just think the books are truly legendary. Everyone can relate to them and they're funny, witty, sad, exciting and familiar from cover to cover, plus the films are tonnes better. Twilight doesn't even compare. By the way, you can only say which is better if you've read both, robert pattinson fangirls can't just say 'zomg twilight is lyk da best cuz its sooo good!' :| paha....
harry potter.
i hate twilight. xD
harry potter ruleeeees!
mkay...
pros of twilight: Edward was a really well developed character. the internal struggle he had to face in falling in love with a mortal was really well portrayed. and also the decision as to whether or not he should allow Bella to become a vampire.

cons of twilight: Bella was kinda... whiny for lack of a better word. And I thought the movie was atrocious. I think it would have been better if a movie hadn't been made. Because every girl that read that book (or all the ones I know) had their own idea of what Edward would be like. and trying to put that into a real person kinda ruined the... magic of it I guess.
I haven't seen New Moon yet, but I've heard so far that it was better than Twilight.

pros of Harry Potter: amazing story line. It takes a lot of talent as an author to publish a seven book series and have things from the first book connect to things in the seventh. definitely more planned out and a lot deeper than Twilight. The characters were more developed (due mostly to the fact that it was a seven book series, as opposed to four) It had a lot of different elements to it. romance, humor, coming of age, fantasy (magic, dragons, giants, etc.) The characters in Harry Potter were easier to relate to, because they weren't all perfect Also, the movies followed the books fairly accurately (except The Half-Blood Prince that one kinda sucked)

cons of Harry Potter: I can't really think of any. in case you haven't figured it out, I'm a huge Harry Potter nerd. I guess the only one I can think of is sometimes when you read the Harry Potter series you get too attached to the characters, and it's hard to read the seventh book knowing that it is the end.
Uhm. Interesting. Harry Potter was another kind of movies. I Think we can't tell who is the most better. But Twilight is the MOViE OF THE YEAR. We can't deny. :) .
WANDS.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

FOE Exclusive

FOE Radio

FOE on Facebook

Forum

Sabrina Füreder

Hottest guys in the world..;) 120 Replies

Started by Sabrina Füreder. Last reply by Ronnie.G on Saturday.

drinkingtea

Favourite lyricists and songwriters? 26 Replies

Started by drinkingtea. Last reply by RìÇhmøñd MaXìmùs Åwøk Skywàlkér on Friday.

Amanda Traver

Guily Pleasure tv show

Started by Amanda Traver Feb 7.

Groups

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Photos

Loading…
  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2012   Created by FriendsOrEnemies.   Powered by .

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service